Not All Knots Are Created Equal ; About every fisherperson has their favorite knot. But just how strong is it? Have you ever lost a fish because of it failing? If not, then you probably will not be that interested in this article. If you do have a break, where does it break, does it have a slight pigtail at the break, or does it just come untied at the eye? Each of these signs of slippage/breakage need to be investigated and understood. Using the same knot and getting negative results over and over, blaming it on the line, may actually be your knot.
With so many knots available that you could learn to tie for specific uses, you need to have confidence in your knot and can tie it correctly every time. The weakest link between the fish and you is the knot. So take the time to practice, practice, practice long before you get to your favorite fishing hole.
There are many knots available, some are developed for different types of fishing and may not pertain to other types. If you are not sure what fits your type, ask around. Sure you will get many different answers, but that is a start. There will be some are the most popular, usually because of the ease of tying, however the important thing is to have a strong knot and ease of tying is a bonus. Again, practice before you get on the water will ensure that you will make a strong and secure knot every time. You just never know when you might hook into the trophy of a lifetime! You certainly don’t want your knot to fail then. That is why I started tying my own leaders instead of using store bought, mass produced ones that were given me by a “friend” and that I was trying to use them up, where we lost 2 nice Chinook because of knot failure in 2 days at Buoy 10 a number of years ago.
To help understand various knot strengths, I built a KnotBuster. Which is simply a 50# Rapala tube fish scale (non digital) that records the heaviest weight when the line is wrapped around a small leather drum attached to a crank handle. I selected this fish scale, because at the time the digitals were not on the market AND after looking at the digitals when considering making another unit, there was some concern that the shock of the considerable number of line breakings, this digital may not have a longevity as the older mechanical device. Even the mechanical scale had to be rebuilt because the top threaded on cap was made of plastic, which soon stripped the threads out that were threaded into the upper tube housing. A new brass cap had to be made, that has stood the test of time (many hundreds of knots tested). The easy part of attaching the scale to the framework was by using 1″ rifle scope rings and base mounts. One thing on this scale, it appears that the register pointer moves about 1/2# before it indicates at zero, if that is so, maybe all these numbers are 1/2# light, however the ratio is still the same for all.
In use, about 24″ of line is used, and tied to a large barrel swivel. The opposite swivel eye is slid onto the scale’s hook with the line then wrapped around the spool a couple of times. These wraps need to be positioned so that as the winch spool is cranked down, that the wraps are away enough as to not allow the line coming from the knot to come in contact with the tension wraps. During testing, hand tension is maintained on the line’s tail while slowly and evenly cranking the handle until something breaks. We did not reuse the other possible stressed end of the line.
We found that a monofilament line of about 20# was about right as far as allowing for a wider range as being near the center of the scale’s range for breakage and ease of tying.
At three of our recent CCA fundraiser banquets, this machine was used to add money to our coffers and to find the local fishing knot tying champion. One person did all the testing to maintain continuity. The fee for entering was $5.00 a knot and the prize over the years ranged from a framed fishing photo, a 9′ steelhead rod with a Shimano reel and a Frabill Hiber-Net which was a collapsible net that stores inside the handle.
The participants could tie any knot they wanted. The prime objective of course was to record the breaking point of the knot, but not a breaking of the line. We also tried to keep track of the style of knot, however some of these contestants would not tell us the knot they were using or possibly did not even know the name of it. For those of us operating this device, we pretty well could tell the knot by just looking at it or how the person was tying even if they tried to hide the actual act of doing so. The line varied over these years from 20# Stren monofilament (gold color for better visibility), to Danielson white, to P-Line chartreuse. No hooks were used for safety’s sake, but LARGE barrel swivels were the attachment point.
During these sessions, it soon became evident that the 2 top strengths was pretty well split between the Palomar and Double Clinch knot with the Uni-knot coming in third. Some broke in the knot while others broke the line about 3/4″ in front of the swivel eye. The real difference appeared to be the method of actual tying (more likely the final pull tight on dry line). By this it seemed that when the line broke, it was probably because the tier did not lubricate the line/knot well prior pulling it tight and friction roughed the line, weakening it. Even Copenhagen juice was tried, but did not seem to make much of a significant difference. One even brought his own Vaseline lubricant.
There were about 40 entrants one year with the breaking point of the knots in this experiment ranged from 15# to 23.3#, with the bulk of the breakings being between 18# and 21# for the Stern line. We considered that this was probably about right, in that the line weight was 20#. When the line actually broke because of fraying, it was closer to 17#. The Danielson line was limper and required a closer inspection just before the final tightening process to ensure that a tight loop was not pulled under the wraps. The P-Line we used being a little stiffer performed well, however right off the spool, it seemed to be considerable slipperier, requiring the tail of the knot to be pulled tighter and left a bit longer. The highest tested knot using the P-line was 29# with other high numbers 27#, 27.5# and a tie at 24.5#, while most were in the 18-21# range. It seemed to have a more consistent and higher breaking point.
We found that some lines would break before the knot and under these conditions we did not want the tier in a situation where they paid only to have the line break. So by trying different makes of lines before the event, we found a couple that always broke in the knot. This solved that problem. When using the medium to stiffer lines if the knot was good for that line, it was prone to have the line occasionally break before the knot. These being the common higher grade lines, like Maxima, Shakespeare, Ande etc. We had to find a line that the knot itself would break otherwise we had participants who demanded (and justifiably so) a second or even third FREE try. The one line we found that would continually break IN the knot was Danielson, which is a very limp line. The suspicion was that since it was so limp, that if the participant was not really observant when doing the final pull tight effort, there may have been a tight loop that did not get straightened out but then unknowingly resulted in a kink being pulled into and under some of the wraps of the knot.
However we encountered some fishermen who looked down on the cheaper Danielson line, especially if THEIR knot broke at a lower number than the winner, so the following year we moved to the P-Line CXX, which was somewhat stiffer, and we got no negative questioning even from the losers.
|Here our Knotmaster is checking out the strength of a knot|
For those of you who have never tried to give your knot a test, if you get the chance, this can be a very educational learning experience. There is a difference in tying a knot to a swivel as compared to a hook, so try both. However protect yourself, or utilize some sort of cover over the hook as it will usually go flying at the line/knot break.
If you do not have access to a machine like this, you can devise a tester by using a Berkley digital scale, or use an empty soup or soda can, cut the lid out and tie it to something solid. Keep adding sinker weights, until the knot or line breaks.
In much testing, one of our PSA members has discovered, many small things that contribute to a better knot. (1) When tying a Palomar knot to a hook, do not pull the loop onto the eye of the hook, but on the line in front of the hook, which increases the knot strength considerably. He even leaves a tad bit of space between the loops and the eye, that may tighten down when a fish is on, but the knot strength here is even greater. (2) When tying a egg looped knot, make your initial wraps at least 12 wraps before you loop it back to make the egg loop, using another 6 wraps. This does 2 things, provides more room for the egg cluster, but more importantly increases the knot strength as when he only tied 6 or even 8 wraps the knot would break at the area where the loop wraps started. Maybe it would be stronger when it had an egg sac under the loop? His thoughts were possibly with more wraps this did not let the rear wraps slip forward.?? One very successful guide has said his egg loop leaders are tied using 15 wraps. I tie 16 wraps just because I don’t like uneven numbers.
When tying leaders using a Snell Knot onto a hook or with other conventional methods, the strongest way to tie the leader onto the hook is to wrap it so that when holding the hook in your left hand, and do a clockwise wrap going around the shank first. This places the leader around the solid part (shank) of the eye, and not laying on the cut end of the eye that in against the shank. With GOOD hooks it may make no difference, but if you get a hook that this eye is not formed well, many times if you get a lost fish due to a cut leader at the hook’s eye, you will find that the leader was pulled into this sharp cut off end of the eye loop and all you will have a small pig tail at the cut end of the line.
Learn to tie a double or even triple hook mooching leader as at times you will want a cut plug a herring and to only have the front hook in the bait, with the back hook trailing, with this you then need to tie your leader hook distances appropriately.
For those of you who are interested, purchase the paperback book “Tying Strong Knots” by Bill Herzog. Or on the internet, Google “fishing knots” where most of the illustrations below came from.
Listed below are some common fishing knots using conventional methods and a brief instructions in tying them.
Common Fishing Knots
1. Pass the line through the eye of the
hook, or swivel.
2. Double back. make five turns around
3. Pass the end of the line through the
first loop, above the eye. Draw the
knot into shape.
4. Slide the coils down tight against the eye.
| Improved Clinch Knot
1. Pass the line through the eye of the
hook, or swivel.
2. Double back. make five turns around
3. Pass the end of the line through the first
loop, above the eye, and then through
the large loop. Draw the knot into
4. Slide the coils down tight against the
| Jansik Special
Another very simple knot that can be tied in the dark and has a high strength
1. Put 15cm of line through the eye of the
| Float Stop
Float fisherman use a sliding float for casting and yet being able to adjust it’s dept. This knot stops the float from sliding up the line. The advantage that the stops can move readily through the rod guides, but grips the monofilament nylon so tightly that the float will not slide up the line.
It should be made of Dacron, usually the same diameter as the line itself.
1. Take 2 or 3 turns around the main line
A good method of forming a loop in the line above the sinker. This knot stands out at right angles to the line.
1. Form a loop in the line.
2. Take hold of one side of the loop, then make 6 or more turns around the line itself.
3. This is the tricky part – keep open the point where the twists, are being made.
4. Take hold of the other side of the loop, and pull it through the centre opening. use a finger in this loop so that it is not lost.
5. Hold this loop between the teeth. Pull gently on both ends of the line, making the turns gather on either side of the loop.
6. Draw up the knot by pulling the lines as tightly as possible. The turns will make the loop stand at right angles to the line.
|Improved San Diego Knot
A good, yet simple and easy knot to tie
1. Run the line through the eye
2. Pull it out, make a loop. Pinch this loop
3. Make at least 5 wraps over both the mainline and loop. Tuck the tail in between the loop at the eye
4. Pull the tail forward and tuck it under the front loop that you are pinching
5. Wet the complete loose knot. Pull the mainline tight, while maintaining tension on the tail by holding with your teeth
The Basic San Diego Knot only uses one tuck at the upper loop.
After our CCA banquet fundraiser event, my curiosity was aroused and I started my own testing with the results shown below, it became obvious that stiffness of the mono seemed to have an outcome on the knot breakage. Stiffer lines (to a degree) seemed to allow for better even wraps, which then seemed to do better because of non overlapping/or pinching conditions. I tried to perform a stiffness test by allowing 6″ of this line to protrude from my fingers, and then see just how much gravity drop each had. This proved fruitless in that line right off the spool had a memory situation. I finally just arranged these test lines in my own visual observation, with the possible stiffer lines being on the left of the chart below.
|20# Berkley Trilene Big Game||20# Ande
| 20# Shakespeare
Premium plus 7
|.0180 Dia.||.0180 Dia.||.0180 Dia.||.0177 Dia.||.0184 Dia.||.0183 Dia.||.0184 Dia.|
|Clinch Knot||slips, will not stay tied||12.6 – 13.3||slips, will not stay tied||14.3 – 16.2||slips, will not stay tied||slips, will not stay tied||12.1 -13.3|
|Improved Clinch||19.3 – 20.0||15.5 – 18.5||13.8 – 15.2||14.9 – 21.2||12.1 – 17.1||14.2 – 15.7||15.2 – 17.5|
|Basic San Diego||17.5 – 20.5||17.3 – 19.5||15.1 – 17.2||16.4 – 17.3||16.6 – 18.4||15.5 – 15.7||11.5 – 14.1|
|Imp. San Diego||25.0 – 26.5||26.2 – 26.3||20.9 – 22.9||19.1 – 21.5||16.2 – 20.1||18.1 – 20.6||13.3 – 19.0|
|Uni-Knot||19.4 – 26.0||18.8 – 22.3||18.4 – 19.2||20.6 – 22.3||16.5 – 17.9||16.3 – 18.3||13.0 – 17.4|
|Trilene Knot||16.6 – 17.1||17.3 – 24.2||16.4 – 17.9||17.3 – 21.2||14.3 – 17.5||15.8 – 16.6||12.1 – 17.2|
|Palomar Knot||17.8 – 18.8||21.2 – 23.5||16.4 – 20.8||20.6 – 22.3||17.5 – 19.5||15.5 – 19.2||17.1 – 17.8|
|Jansik Special||23.6 – 24.5||24.2 – 27.2 *||14.4 – 17.5||16.2 – 17.3||14.5 – 16.5||14.5 – 18.0||15.3 – 16.2|
|Berkley Braid||21.8 – 24.5||12.5 – 12.6||20.8#||slips, will not stay tied||11.2 – 14.0||untied at 11#||14.8 – 15.6|
|Snell Knot||21.1 – 24.6||21.5 – 23.1||16.2 – 21.7||20.2 – 21.5||16.2 – 19.8||17.3 – 18.3||14.2 – 19.1|
|Egg Loop Knot||20.7 – 23.2||26.3 – 27.5||20.3 – 20.8||21.3 – 22.5||19.9 – 22.1||18.1 – 19.0||16.5 – 19.5|
|Slider Mooching||16.0 – 17.8||These were discontinued for a safety issue of not being able to retain/contain the hooks at the break, but do give a representative number|
During the above tests, 20 pound test monofilament lines were used throughout (except the Berkley Trilene where 25# was used, but was reduced by 20% for the numbers seen here). Some lines were new off the shelf, while others were older, but never on a reel or exposed to heat or sunlight. No special inspection of any knot was done (except the Snell knots as explained below), simple tying, tightening and then tested. This non inspection probably accounts for a few wide ranges of knot breakage of some styles of knots, but I was trying to duplicate a on the water/stream bank situation. All single looped knots were wrapped using 5 wraps, double looped knots used 3 wraps. All knots were lubricated using saliva. No pliers were used to pull the tail, just a extra length as a tag pulled by hand or tightened by pulling with your teeth. A minimum of 3 knots were tied for each test. The numbers shown above were just what was recorded and not averaged out. Low breakages were NOT discounted.
For tying leaders to hooks, most fishermen use a larger size line (many times 5# to 10# more) to compensate for abrasion or possible teeth nicks.
The Snell Knot was tied using 10 wraps on a 3/0 Mustad Octopus hook. These knots were somewhat of a surprise, but it seems by the nature of the knot, on the final pull, IF you do not initially have the leader AND the tail parallel, you can easily get one line laying across the other, which cuts one of them. When poking the leader back through forward at the start, just before the wrapping of the tie, the tail needs to be on the opposite side of the loop, which is laying along the hook shank when you start your 1st wrap. When finished, the leader exiting the hook’s eye needs to be on TOP of the 1st wrap.
Also for the Snell and Egg Loop knots, when pulling the wraps, stop just before the final snug up and check the last loop for a possible kink. If you stop the pull just right, you can pick it back with your fingernail, which will allow it to then straighten out, otherwise you will have a twist under the other loops that you will never see, which can create a weak spot.
The Egg Loop Knot was wrapped 16 with initial wraps, then 9 more to produce the loop’s knot. Initially in testing, this loop knot wraps were only 6, but slippage was experienced, creating friction and breakage. These knots appeared stronger and more consistent than the snell knot, probably because of no overlaying at the eye. However when they broke it was at the juncture of the 2 wraps where the loop came out. It appears for these, they need to be pulled TIGHT for the final tying.
The Slider Mooching tie consisted of using a standard Snell tie on the bottom, then a slider for the top hook. The slider tie was simply using a egg loop tie over the main leader. The low breaking number shown above was as normally tied. The higher number shown was achieved by adding a 4mm plastic bead between the two hooks as a buffer. This knot was included in this just as a “What If” question arose as it’s breaking point will actually depend on the lower knot.
Observations/Conclusions: This test revealed many long standing commonly perceived “good line/bad line” misconceptions. Common sense dictates that it hard to really compare knots alone, as line characteristics are thoroughly involved in this mix also. That is what this test set out to accomplish.
Some fishermen do not rely on advertised line weight, but by line diameter. Apparently some manufacturers over rate while others under rate their lines as far as weight goes. Others, if they do list the diameter on the spool, it may not be exactly true, and if so, will always be smaller than actual, because they somehow want to relate line size to being smaller for less visibility or water resistance, putting out the impression that their line is better. How do you know without doing your own measuring or line breaking tests? For those of you who want to take a look at comprehensive line tests by Vince Hawkins for Gamefishin.com CLICK HERE. From my way of looking at this, since each manufacturer has different specifications as for hardness/limpness which may have been established for lines to be used under different conditions, line diameter may not be significantly linked directly to actual knot breaking strength.
Line breaking strength means nothing if the line’s characteristics does not allow it to tie strong knots.
Another thing that you need to be aware of is that some manufacturers have different grades, or versions of lines, like Maxima’s Chameleon, Ultragreen or High Visibility, all different versions of the same manufacturer of mono lines. And then names used on lines may not really mean the same to you as it did to someone employed by the manufacturer’s advertising department at the time they tacked on a catchy fraise name. So unless you have done a lot of looking, feeling, tying, you may be like many of us who simply buy what your partner recommended or your uncle has used for years. Do not get caught off-guard if your friend says he uses XYZ line but does not give you the version of it. When you go to buy a line the same as his, you may get a lesser grade than he was using. And some sporting goods stores may not carry all the versions of each brand, just what their buyers order, they inventory and sell. Just because one brand sells well off the dealers shelves, does not mean it may be the best for your application. Also with the newer high visibility lines now being commonly used, some manufacturers may not offer them in the same characteristics as a different but desirable line.
Knot breaking strength will include many other things other than actual line breaking strength. This being the case, one knot may be right for a specific line, but appears totally unsuited for another brand/composition of line. Also some knots appear to be better suited for tying lighter/heavier line weights than others, with 20# seemingly being near the dividing point. It was noticed on some real limp lines, (especially when tying Snelled hook leaders) at the point where the wraps are laying in for their final placement, just before final pull tight, the last loop may form a twisted short loop, and if not straightened before the final pull, will become pulled under the other wraps, creating a weak spot where this twist WAS, which is now UNDER the other wraps that you can not see. This limp line requires close visual observation, especially at the pre-final and final operation of pulling it tight.
Some knots seem to require pliers to tighten the knot’s final tail pull, (like the Clinch Knot or the Berkley Braid Knot) while others performed better with NO pressure on tail at all, therefore just because someone recommends a particular knot, they may have developed other specific minor requirements involved that effect the quality of the finished knot that you were not privy to.
It became apparent during these tests, that on most knots, when the knot is tightened, the tail may be held by the tier’s teeth, but ONLY to maintain a slight amount of tension, keeping the wraps in place, NOT to pull the tail tight, but just to keep the slack out. Any pulling the tail tight needs to be done AFTER the knot is 95% sucked down, then pull the tail to eliminate any looseness in the final knot. Then possibly another pull on the main line to suck everything in. If the tail is pulled tight at the same time the knot is being finalized, this pulling of the tail section COULD disrupt the laying of the wraps, which can then create a weak/tension spot which could lead to premature breakage.
After this test was tabulated, there appeared to be inconsistencies for certain brands/knots. These were looked at and one knot of each was tied as a qualifier. If that breaking point fell within the tabulated numbers, no change was made. Only one line breaking weight was changed (a rather high number totally out of the range) which resulted in discarding all that data and retying three more knots.
From this experiment, it is pretty obvious that if you find one knot that performs well on YOUR favorite line, it MAY not be that good for another brand. This is shown in the above test results for the Jansik Special Knot when you compare the P-Line knot breakage to any of the other line breakage using this same knot.
Some of the stronger more complicated/stronger knots were a Pain In The A$$ to tie, and probably not worthwhile to consider for the on the water fisherman. Therefore a simple easy to tie, consistent, but with possibly a slightly lesser strength knot, seems more practical most of the time. Also in the mix, I considered it important to not having to inspect each knot for proper (exact) lay of the wraps, as many of us older fisherpersons wear bi/tri-focal glasses, and sometimes close-up things become a bit fuzzy if we get fog or water on them, therefore an as wrapped/tied knot would be a more desirable. In that mix is also the fact that many of us old fogies may even have a finger or two deformed or even parts of them missing from accidents from our working life around machinery. Therefore, simplicity again soon becomes a necessity.
Some lines were limp and slippery enough right off of the spool to where a simple knot where the tail was NOT tucked a second time, like the Clinch Knot, (even after pulling tight with a pliers this knot would not stay tied part of the time), however if the line tail was additionally tucked into the front loop like the Improved Clinch Knot, it would then stay tied and hold good. These same lines, after being used a while and having been in the water, seemed to have this problem disappear.
One knot that was tried, but proved hard to tie was eliminated from this test, it being the Double Improved Clinch Knot. It was hard to do an easy tie with mono of this size or larger, resulting in inconsistent good ties and/or showing very erratic results as to the breaking points of the knot, probably because with so many wraps, if some did not lay exactly right, they could cut each other. Another knot that I started out with, but dropped because it was so close to other existing more well known knots was the “Eye Crosser”.
The Berkley Braid knot when used on mono surprised me but it either breaks at a low weight, or even though you pull the “pull through loop” as tight as possible, some slippery lines do not hold the knot enough and it just slips loose. However it did better on the stiffer lines. Just to let you know, it is a bitch to tie with mono.
One thing I found was a occasional considerably high breakage weight number, but these were all traced to line breakage, and not at the knot. These were disregarded and redone. Upon inspection I found that wrapping the tail of the knotted line around the leather padded winch spool, that IF the line coming from the knot came close enough to the other spool tension wraps, the two could interact even slightly and the line would break at that point. The thought here was then that if the knot itself broke, it would be more sudden and the weight register indicator would stay where it was, but if the line got abraded, it would be stretched slightly (usually about an additional 4#) before the actual break, where the indicator would then be reading a higher reading.
Of the knots tested here, the easiest consistent higher strength knot to tie appears to be the Improved San Diego Knot. Then for a second consistent knot, a flip of the coin between the Palomar or the Improved Clinch knot. The San Diego Knot style knots do not have to be conventionally wrapped, but the hook/swivel eye can just be rolled, twisting the line and producing the wraps, which can be helpful if you have cold, wet fingers. Listed here you will find a name that I tacked onto a knot because fits into a sequence of tying that expands into other knots, my Basic San Diego Knot is basically the Improved San Diego Knot but ONLY utilizes the tail tuck at the front loop. I had known and used it for over 60 years as the Fisherman’s Knot, however it goes by other names also, like the Pitzen Knot, or the Eugene Bend knot plus another name or two. One thing when tying this knot be sure you make the single tuck going through from the open side loop and not come in from the back, otherwise you may weaken the knot where it will put tension on, cutting the line upon full tightness.
As a side-note to this, I am using 40# Izor line as a salmon leader and I am using the Basic San Diego Knot, so just to test this knot on my leader swivel, I tied my old standby knot. It broke at 36#.
While we are on knots, when you need to connect braid to mono, the best and easiest is to use a double Uni Knot, (one on each line) but double the braid at the knot location. The doubled braid helps make it “stickier” and less likely to cut into the mono. To clarify this, the doubled over braided line created by your loop AS a single strand and then tie your double Uni Knot as you normally would on each end.
NOTES * This is a very strong knot, and holds quite well, however during our tests, this line broke 50% of the time from 26.7# to 27.7#, mind you using a 20# line.
Copyright © 2011 – 2014 LeeRoy Wisner All Rights Reserved, however some of the knot illustrations are internet copied.